The Official Pokémon YouTube channel/YouTubeThis breaks a long tradition: Every previous entry in the main Pokémon franchise has been released for Nintendo's handheld consoles, from the original Game Boy all the way up to the Nintendo 3DS.
In a broader sense, it reflects a shift upmarket to pricier gadgetry, which you can also see in the smartphone market.for its best-selling Nintendo Switch console.," also for the Switch,"Sword" and"Shield" are proper sequels to the 23-year-old gaming franchise."Let's Go" was a streamlined, simplified remake of 1998's classic"Pokémon Yellow"; these upcoming games will bring new monsters, new gameplay mechanics, and newly-upgraded graphics.
The Nintendo Switch can be played in an untethered, totally portable mode — nonetheless, Nintendo considers it primarily a TV console.It's not much of a surprise. Together, the various versions of the Nintendo 3DS have sold a more-than-respectable 75 million units since the original version debuted in 2011, but the company's own data shows that the platform is stagnating.
The Nintendo Switch, however, costs $300 at retail. And while it's a fine piece of hardware, the Switch is definitely not so durable that you can toss it in a coat pocket or backpack without worrying — unlike every model of 3DS, which is designed solely for extremely portable gaming.
This seems like a bad take, how are you gonna call a $150 2DSXL affordable when the Switch is only twice as much? If I remember correctly the the Original Gameboy cost almost as much as the NES, if anything the is the natural progression but now we're seeing the inverse... 🤔
damn this aint it chief
Seriously? Real Pokémon fans have been waiting on this since the announcement of the switch.
No they aren’t.
The 3DS launched at $249. It's not a big difference.
I'm 33
Gaming Gaming Latest News, Gaming Gaming Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: BusinessInsider - 🏆 729. / 51 Read more »
Source: USATODAY - 🏆 100. / 63 Read more »